article

tap the glass


"interesting water," said the fish.

the premature setting sun reflects off a display case and glares at me. what the hell time is it? stop thinking about that. I continue to stare at my cursor, willing it to move. I flick between the two documents I'm working on. what the hell time is it? shit. it's been 45 minutes since the cursor has moved for either of them. I feel myself losing hope. a part of my brain seems to have resigned itself to the belief that I am not going write anything of interest today. it's meandering around trying to convince the other parts of my brain that this is so. periodically, the polite society of my brain devolves into a lord of the flies-esque fiasco. factions fight over what to do next, other factions just sit around; very little compromise, lots of thrashing.

maybe I've just been watching too much fucking Lost.

the buds of my ipod throb in my ears. the bass usually helps me focus; usually helps me drown out distracting side thoughts. right now, the music seems to be drowning out all of my thoughts. either that, or my internal voice is mumbling. I glare at my ipod for a second and go back to squinting at the cursor. I feel like I'm on the brink of something. somehow the last couple of articles and books I read and re-read, the movies and tv shows I've watched, they are all coming together. more and more, I've said, "YES! that's totally related to what I wanted to say about... about... THAT."

there's a thought, an idea, a theme that's begging to be expressed. Michelangelo once said that sculpting was easy; all you had to do was cut away whatever wasn't part of the statue. Bach said that organ playing is just as easy; push the right keys at the right time. on the subject of writing, Just said "get the thinking right and the sentences will follow." all you have to do is put the right words in the right places.

I can put this non-thought into words, I just need a few more moments longer. block out the glaring sun. block out the bass. block out the smell of cigarettes, the fly that just meandered by, the sticky table, the pain in the ass metal chair, the little nubs on the 'f' and 'j' keys, the...

fuck.

I give.

wait... I clench my eyes and pinch the bridge of my nose in a last, desperate attempt to squeeze that intangible idea out of my head.

fine. fine. fine. you win, ADD. I'm done.

I sigh, open my eyes, close my laptop and look around the room for some sort of inspiration. inspiration usually comes in a 16 oz cup, 150 mg at a time. I think I bought a dud. my cup is almost empty; what's left tastes a little like cigarette smoke. I don't think inspiration is supposed to taste like cigarette smoke.

I'm sitting in an internet cafe / bar. the guy at the table in front of me is staring at his laptop. the girl at the table next to me is staring at her laptop. the couple next to her is staring at their books. two more people at the bar have laptops, another is reading a newspaper and another just fed a dollar into the bar game thingy. three people have headphones on. I would've been the fourth, but I just pulled my earbuds out. in this moment, the only two people here looking at anyone else is the bartender and me.

strike that; the bartender is walking toward his computer and I just re-opened my laptop to scribble down this thought.

there it is.

when Michelangelo finished sculpting his Moses, he took his hammer and hit the knee of the statue and yelled "fuck yeah!" or something to that effect.

Milan and I used to joke about how it'd be awesome to write like a rockstar. like get so pumped about what we were writing that we would type with one hand and throw a fist in the air. I'm starting to type so intensely that I feel like pointing to someone and yelling "AWWWWW YEEEAH!" before putting my laptop on my shoulder and typing more. I should buy disposable wireless keyboards so I can rock out around the coffee shop and smash them into a table when I'm through.

now, I'm smiling. I close my notebook again and look around the room again, just trying to soak the strangeness in. I feel like throwing my notebook across the room, putting my hands in the air and yelling "THANK YOU, PHOENIX!!! WOOOOOO!!!"

on not doing stuff to do stuff

the current incarnation of this site has been up over 4 years now. in the course of those years, there have been torrents of articles and near droughts of articles. let's be frank. the problem with the site right now and for the last couple months (read: maybe even the last few years) is that I've been suffering from an epic bout of writer's block. the other day, I sat down and decided that I want to churn out at least three hundred words for this site every other week. after writing the last sentence, I spent fifteen minutes staring at it and musing about how much more coffee I would need for the task. [around 185 words to go] then another fifteen minutes went by as I tried to block out the irritating conversation next to me by skimming over old unfinished posts. that's when I came across this:

I recently [written three years ago] noticed that after graduating, I began to explore my side-interests (chess, ultimate frisbee, etc) with much less enthusiasm. without school-work, work-work and other more pressing things to attend to, I didn't exert nearly as much effort in pursuing my side-interests.

the term "procrastination" really does not capture the excess that is apparent in what I am capable of. according to the online merriam and webster dictionary, the word "procrastinate" is defined as "to put off intentionally and habitually" or "to put off intentionally the doing of something that should be done." notice the emphasis on intentionality. personally, I don't really choose not to do my work until the last possible minute; I am simply completely incapable of doing so. more detailed observations of productivity reveal that most people experience two critical points during the course of a long project: the "oh shit" point and the "fuck it" point. how momentous these events are vary from person to person. for instance, some people experience not so much an "oh shit" but a resigned "damn" moment when the assignment is given. some people experience a "holy fucking christ almighty shit shit shit shit shit" moment. some people's moments are so close together that the "oh shit / fuck it" dichotomy becomes a single "ah, hell" moment.

of course, once we begin establishing a pattern of behaviors applicable to a subset of humans, the question is how much further can we quantify this subset. the primary observed characteristic is a person's behavior in reaction to the "oh shit" moment. people not only vary in the duration and intensity of "oh shit" but their productivity levels in and out of "oh shit." in other pieces of unpublished writing, I documented two general reactions to "oh shit."

considering the working habits of smart people, one finds at least two kinds of smart. we'll call the first kind the "straight" smart. these are people who study x number hours a day, who make schedules and lists of things to do, who maintain normal sleeping schedules and generally remain productive members of society. they make steady progress through school and through life from point a to point b, operating within the confines of a rule-governed world.

the work of straight smart people seems only mildly affected by the "oh shit" moments; some are slightly hampered by the dread, some are slightly motivated, but almost all of them stick to study plans the professionals would generally consider "sane." this isn't to say that straight smart people don't occasionally have productivity meltdowns. generally though, a complete meltdown is less likely than with a "fringe" smart person.

the second kind is the "fringe" smart people who don't study, who don't go to class, who rarely sleep according to anything that could even in the loosest sense of the word could be be considered a "schedule" and who rarely make lists that aren't quickly swallowed under heaping piles of laundry. of course you realize that if you study 2 hours a day and go to every class and maybe maybe occasionally bought a textbook, you would have a phenomenal GPA and probably a great deal less stress. but, this is not interesting. what is interesting is watching TV, listening to music, playing video games and other behavior that can only be described as "dicking around." what is interesting is not spending a single second more than necessary on any given assignment. what is interesting is writing a paper by using a combination of fear, adrenaline and caffeine to forcibly eject it from your brain.

for the fringe smart, any attempt at productivity before "oh shit" is a lost cause. before an "oh shit" point, nothing can be done. let me qualify that: in the "pre oh shit" phase, nothing productive can be done in relation to the project causing the "oh shit" moment. fringe smart people are notoriously productive in ridiculously unproductive pursuits. when large projects are due, they are capable of producing incredible and irrelevant works and acquiring amazingly in-depth and useless information. they expend a fantastic amount of effort that could be better spent on task at hand. I am generally amused when I realize I spent more effort on figuring how to get out of a task than the actual task would've taken. they raise procrastination to an art form and occasionally get irritated when someone talks about how they procrastinated "sooooooo much" by watching tv for an hour or two. it's like telling a concert pianist you understand and respect their craft because you have chopsticks as a ringtone.

still, an interesting and important question is whether or not these high level productivity can be recreated in the absence of "oh shit" situations. I think this is what's currently wrong with the site. with the absence of significant "oh shit" moments, both productivity and creativity have been fizzling the last few years. thinking back, I'm not sure if it's ironic or fitting that blinkingtwelve.org began as a stack of html pages created by a bored and frustrated intern pretending to be busy to avoid meaningless projects, but it would definitely be sad if I am incapable of doing what I want to do because I don't have any work to avoid doing and because nothing is causing enough of an "oh shit" moment.

many who suffer from this "affliction" cope with it by attempting to create artificial "oh shit" situations. generally, this doesn't work well for me because my brain is so fantastical I tend to realize that I'm trying to fool myself. other methods of dealing with this involve just whining and bitching about it. sometimes I succumb to this tendency, but the causes and ramifications of bitching about something you have control over will be the topic for another post. for now, I've more than met my 300 word quota, so I can go back to doofing around.

Garden State (soundtrack)

my last year of school in chicago, some random evenings would begin with someone buying a couple of CD's or bringing CD's somewhere ("what are you up to?" "absolutely nothing, but I got music") and end with everyone in a living room crowded around a coffee table full of mudslides and beer. inevitably, some mess of rock and electronica provided a backdrop for fervent and entertaining conversations which were punctuated by the more tipsy of us exclaiming, "you've never heard of [the YADDA YADDA band]?!?! you MUST listen to them RIGHT NOW." as nerdy as it may seem, this wasn't a competition to belittle our friends and lord our extensive music knowledge over them. the evenings weren't frantic with strutting and puffing of nerdiness. well, not always. more often than not, these were evenings of simply enjoying good things; beer, music, company. it was us saying "savor this. relish its awesomeness."

during one of those weekends or between them or whatever, I got a wild hair up my ass to develop a playlist entitled "music to lay around and waste the day to." the goal was to create a mix that wouldn't put you to sleep, wouldn't make you feel antsy and wouldn't make you feel like laying around all day contemplating or just enjoying music was a waste of time. after awhile, milan and I managed to string together a series of songs which created a vague impulse to sit down and maybe recline a little, but nothing worthy of the title. the project was soon aborted or forgotten and filed under "random shit that would be cool to work on after I get a perscription for adderall."

the garden state soundtrack is what I would've tried to create, if I hadn't kept myself so busy with being lazy. the music is, for lack of better descriptors, refreshing. comforting. the songs seemed to be selected in the same "hey, listen to this, it's neat" way that we spent our weekends. so much of pop music nowadays seems to inspire or express angst, pain and irritation. or, the music is designed and manufactured to make us feel cool. "I broadcast my badassedness by blaring sheer cool from my speakers. acknowledge my might!" not that I myself don't occasionally roll my car windows down and crank up the ludwig van, but such constant brazen self-assertion and angst tires the soul. I find myself more and more easily exhausted by the clamoring and whining of "sir, I exist!" from those who haven't realized that, frankly, the universe doesn't give a damn.

take a break from all that. sit outside. put the album on. take a deep breath. let yourself be saturated in the everyday visceral. the soundtrack makes no demands of you or your attention except maybe one; drift. obey and after a few moments, I swear it seems like even the trees sway in time to the music. maybe I'm just a sucker for music that makes me want to lay down, close my eyes and smile. maybe 200 mg of caffeine is bound to make most people euphoric. whatever it is, this CD definitely inspires whatever bliss within you (even the most minute memory of it) to well up and sweep you away. some magic within the listless strumming and the gentle crooning inspires the sweetest melancholy, nostalgia, and optimism. cheers to the realization that so many ecstatic moments have come and gone, but should we choose, we can find ourselves immersed in more like them. cheers to the realization that a significant amount of our stress is about the insignificant. cheers to art that reminds us that the ecstatic can be found in the everyday.

buy this disc. savor it. relish its awesomeness.

Frances the Mute


honestly, I shouldn't be writing this review of Frances the Mute by the Mars Volta simply because I haven't listened to the damn thing enough to form what you might call a coherent understanding of the album. I think that should say something about the disc though. as mentioned in a previous post, Frances the Mute has been particularly disappointing because it was so highly recommended. my first impression was lost amid overwhelming waves of irritation, so I took a break from it before giving the disc a couple more earnest listens. despite some genuinely creative parts, I just can't call this CD "good." whether or not you do depends on how you answer the question, "can raging narcissistic genius still be considered genius?"

the album is kinda like a shitty action movie. over time, you learn to just disregard the bad parts and wait for the good ones. the good parts of this disc are moments of near brilliance. asynchornous conflicting harmonies thrash passionate driving soundscapes and all that bullshit. the music is undeniably novel. and in an era where most pop music is hyper-polished piles of shit, it's occasionally refreshing to hear something a little rough around the edges.

occasionally. but then again, mars volta is rough around the edges like $200 "broken-in" diesel jeans are rough around the edges. kinda, but not. a bunch of times you want to shake the band like the whining babies they are and scream "what the shit are you trying to pull here?"

all too often, rodriguez lopez screeches in the same way he imagines "true rockers" should screech and too many moments of the album are reminiscent of hair-metal jam sessions. parts of the CD are the musical equivalent of some moron rambling on about the moral implications of a science article he read in newsweek. smatterings of noise and dissonance are smugly thrown in between moments of harmony as if to demonstrate self-congratulatory musical enlightenment: "you just don't get it. you hear harmony AND dissonance, but we hear harmony IN the dissonance." wrong, asshole. sometimes, the emperor is just naked. that noise isn't music, it's just noise. and calling yourselves "progressive" doesn't give you license to shit into a jewel case and call it art.

rhodes retread - part 1

the other day, out of an extreme and overwhelming desire to be annoyed, I accepted an opportunity to speak at my old junior high. with my low threshold for frustration, one would expect to find me snatching saggy trousered twits and breaking the brats across my knee in no time. being immersed in this particular brand of idiocy on a near constant basis, however, I have developed a bit of tolerance for it. this combined with the euphoric effects of intaking a couple hundred milligrams of caffeine every few hours made the situation a bit more bearable-- even to the point of inspiring a bit of nostalgia and introspection.

the kids were at an age where their personalities and identities were emerging-- mostly either buying whole-heartedly into mtv culture or being strictly molded by their parents. you could see the developing seeds of future yuppies and mean girls and misogynistic males, natural born leaders, diligent drones and, of course, the outcasts. between students, there was a constant unconscious social experimentation; near pavlovian tests of which actions garner attention, affection, rejection and disapproval. the hallway was a zoo of screaming, strutting, laughing, posturing and parading that reminded me in many ways of some of the clubs I've been in.

as I wandered around and marvelled at how the school had at once changed so much and yet so little, I wondered about the roots of my own self, my own identity. what shaped me? what was my method of experimentation?

I found myself in the social studies department during one of my breaks.

of all the teachers I've ever had, I think my 7th grade social studies teacher liked me the least. I wasn't disrespectful or disruptive or anything like that. no, the problem was that a good friend of mine at the time was remarkably adept at making assorted gadgets to launch small objects and I had no qualms about testing these gadgets during class.

the class was fairly big (30+ kids) and excruciatingly slow, even by public school standards. we sat in opposite corners of the classroom, basically wallowing in our boredom until we devised a way to shoot messages at each other silently and effortlessly. this worked astonishingly well (usually leaving us in fits of giggling) until one misfire made a note punctuate the sentence my teacher was writing on the board. my gadget was confiscated (and may I add, marvelled for its engineering prowess) and I was let off with a roll of the eyes.

clearly, our text-messaging system needed some tweaking.

I found side projects like this infinitely more interesting than lessons about how the pilgrims invented the indians and so forth. as such, I spent my time doodling schematics instead of copying sections out of the textbook or even listening to the teacher. given that I understood the material and I was within a few points of setting the curve on every single test, I felt that the homework was unnecessary. I didn't bother doing a 400 point "project packet" I considered to be "stupid retarded." with all the time in class to work on our designs, my friend and I managed to reinvent the messaging system with some fishing line, hooks and paperclips. I finished that quarter feeling like I had accomplished something.

that feeling only lasted until the report card came.

continued next week

ADHS update for May

a milder version of this article to the Arizona Department of Health Services a little while ago in response to the request, "give us an update." the only other guideline I was given was "it should be informative." I think I failed on both objectives, but it was still fun to write.

Some six months ago, I joined the forces of good to present POWER [a rape prevention program] to junior high and high schools in the area. So far, it's been wildly entertaining. Somewhere amid angry parents, unattentive kids, skeptical teachers and what seems like 2 million idiot drivers who every morning think that the quickest way to get from point a to point b is to stand on their brake pedals, somewhere amid all of this, I managed to find something I truly enjoy doing. What drives a slacker to give up his slacker life to brave this veritable circus? Masochism? The huge load of karma points? Cognitive dissonance? Pure raging narcissism? Perhaps.

Mostly, the answer can be found in the classroom doing whatever it is that we do. Our goal, our mission objective is date and acquaintance rape prevention. In practical terms, this means getting students to recognize it, avoid it and hopefully do something about it above and beyond simply "feeling bad" about it. "Rape" and "sexual assault" to a lot of students seem like terms that refer to horrendous acts, but horrendous acts that are remote, removed, random. They are imagined to be acts a deranged criminal, a thug, a stranger commits to a helpless victim who just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. Most of our work revolves around getting students to realize that though this is the stereotypical situation we imagine, it is not the stereotypical situation.

The bulk of the program focuses on a remarkably simple premise: No one wants to have an unhealthy or abusive relationship, but people of every age, race and socio-economic status find themselves in these relationships all the time. Very often, we find both students and ourselves dismissing other people's behaviors with "oh, they're just stupid", "they're immature", "they have low self-esteem." In a classroom setting, it's easy to make lists, point to them and say "That gooood", "That baaad". Outside of class however, we find it even easier to neglect our lists. Students see relationships without trust, without respect. They see incredible acts of cruelty commit under the banner of love. They see malice of all kinds endured for acceptance.

One subject people almost universally like to talk about is other people; more specifically, other people's dating situations. The what, the who, the how many M&M's. Granted, sometimes we find that students are so used to zoning out for whatever reason that it takes a little prodding for them to realize that we are talking about situations that apply to them. Situations they see every day. Situations in "their world". "Is a girl who dresses a certain way asking to be harassed?" "Do you think a 25-year-old and a 17-year-old can have a healthy relationship?" "Is 'giving in' the same as 'giving consent'?"

They begin to think more carefully about how and why people get into the relationships, how people can be broken down, why they stay in such relationships. Curiosity is piqued. Thoughts begin turning. The stories begin. Given a little time, our focus on relationships has a tendency to open the floodgates with these students.

This, as an avid people-watcher, is the part of my job that I love the most. Depending on the class, I get to play a cross between Dr. Phil and Carson Daly with the occasional Jerry Springer thrown into the mix.

We come across a fantastic mix of personalities. The apathetic, the innocent, the truly worn-- 16 year olds who are already tired of life. There are tight-lipped, god-fearing classes who snap to silent attention at even a vaguely disapproving look. There are madhouses where exhausted teachers are so shell-shocked they no longer seem to hear the volleys of insults and rambling stories about how "one time me and my friends was sooooo f---ing high...." There is a range of maturity levels from those who giggle at the word "sex" to those who no longer flinch at the word "rape". Children who are always trying to look for the "right" answer and little punks who try to find the exception to every rule. Teens wide-eyed because they never imagined that people could be so terrible to the ones they "love" the most. Teens wide-eyed because we talk to them about their own lives.

All in all, I tend to have a hard time describing the job to those who ask me about it. I have a harder time explaining what it is I enjoy so much. The last few months been shocking, eye-opening, frustrating, hilarious, invigorating, but most of all, poignant in all sorts of ways. The best I can do is this: in this job, we see the same circus, the same play we've seen in ourselves, in our friends, in some form of another all around us, all of our lives. This time, though, we get to rewind and pause and examine some bits a little closer. The best is when we get the actors to see what's coming and change some bits and hopefully make it a little better in the long run.

if food be the music of love




there often comes a point in a dating relationship where a couple no longer worries about how they eat in front of each other. many couples reach a point where neither of people involved mind when the other stuffs their face so enthusiastically they end up wearing part of their food. some couples never really reach this point. others reach this point and hang out there for a little while before drifting back to some level of daintiness.

granted, there is no single explanation for this shift; perhaps, it's the mark of someone no longer trying to impress their significant other and therefore indicates loss of interest. perhaps, it's a sign of someone no longer worried about losing their significant other and therefore indicates a certain degree of comfort and trust. whatever the reason may be, this is not something I am considering at the moment. the fact is I'm not considering much of anything at the moment because I'm too busy stuffing my head full of food.

color me glamorous.

a pause in the action allows my flailing brain to catch its breath and keep from drowning in a sea of liquified meat and pita. I come to the sudden unfortunate realization that my mouth and part of my face are covered with tzatziki. I say unfortunate because I have my hands full with a disintegrating gyro. now, I'm stuck because if I set the gyro down, it'll completely fall apart and I'll have to eat it with a fork.

damnit.

I feel like certain foods-- sandwiches, burritos, pizzas-- though they may start to come apart as you eat them, they lose a certain essence of themselves (in this instance, "gyro-ness") if you give up, opt for daintiness and eat them with a fork. this may be simple stubborness on my part. this may be just borderline OCD. I really have no idea. all I know is I got two fistfuls of gyro and a faceful of tzatziki that I have to do something about. I pause to consider whether I can wipe my face with the side of the gyro or something.

or something.

mmmmm.... gyro.

instead of doing anything, I end up having one of those moments where I think I'm thinking, but in actuality, I just stare blankly at my food.

a giggle brings my attention across the table. funny how in all of this, I forgot that I'm not sitting by myself. I have no idea how long she's been watching this drama unfold. maybe I can act like this idiocy is intentional. maybe I can pass this off as one of my zany moments. I'm a zany guy. this is on purpose. this, of course, is how idiots who've been laughed at all their lives make a feeble attempt to laugh with.

her eyes gleam mischeviously. hrmmm... attempt failed. she sees right through it. I think I'm about to get embarrassed. she pauses a moment longer just because she knows I'm waiting to be filled in on a joke at my expense. with grin and a little flair, she strains to spread her arms as far apart as she can.

"this much." she says.

I'm dumbfounded. I'm normally not too quick on the uptake, but now I'm really struggling. what the hell is going on here? with a headful of tzatiki, there isn't room for the brain to work with. I give up.

"this much what?" I reply very tentatively-- still just sitting there with my mouth full and still clutching my gyro remnants like a goddamn twit.

"I like you this much."

warning, overwhelming cuteness has melted the brain.

gawk for a moment longer before swallowing, dropping the mess of food, wiping the face and finally, finally, at long last, leaning across the table.

email from soho

...this town/apex of civilization/whatever-youwanna-call-it is pretty cool. i find a lot of closed doors, having little money and virtually no connections with which to open them, but i am surviving, slinging the ol' espresso in SoHo, one of the sibling fashion capitols of the world. the store [ pictured above ] is on the busiest intersection, with modeling agencies stretching in all cardinal directions which means a) the prices at the store is mad whack, b) disgustingly dumb pretty people walk in as the center of the universe. i must admit, i occasionally gravitate toward a celestrial body... unexpected perk #1: served Robin Williams a double espresso even though he didn't need it. u.p. #2: heckled Quentin Tarantino while hawking lemonade on sidewalk (note: heckle=offered with great timbre and volume). u.p. #3: shared an elevator with Milla Jovavich and intensely imagined saying "hi" or "chicken good."

sh(om)it

t-mobile sidekick

milan and I realized a few years ago that we have a slight problem with "want / need" distinction. I would say that this becomes "a problem" when you find yourself saying things like "I WANT food," but "I NEED a new digital camera." after a little while of training myself that I didn't NEED small brushed metal objects in the hunter-gatherer sense of the word-- incidentally, this training consisted of buying several small brushed metal objects--I went through a period where I could successfully distinguish between WANTing to go to vegas and NEEDing to sleep occasionally.

unfortunately, I think I'm having a relapse. I rediscovered this problem of mine as I was deciding whether or not I "need" a t-mobile sidekick. I had a moment of bewildering self-awareness in which my brain struggled to grasp the fact that I was considering whether or not it would be necessary to buy a second cell phone. like that fact was a wet thrashing salmon and my brain had small meaty hands with stubby fingers. or something.

with my brain occupied with that, I'll probably end up running out and buying the damn thing sometime soon.

on the trail of the working ray


the working ray is an elusive beast. so few people have seen it in action that most assume that such a beast (scientific name: "rayus industrius") simply doesn't exist; that the more prevalent lazy ray ("rayus slackerus") is the only kind of its species. in work environments, the lazy ray may disguise itself by puffing up and spewing technical jargon and occasionally screeching wildly. most of the time, the lazy ray will actually simply be typing emails, chatting on IM and changing the fonts of an otherwise static document. the true working ray has thus far eluded direct scrutiny, leaving evidence of its existence in the form of massive papers that appear overnight and immaculately organized mp3 collections. however, this evidence sketches such a vague impression of the working ray that skeptics abound and insist, "just because you get presents in the morning, it doesn't mean santa was there last night."

Syndicate content